NHL Free Agency: 5 Worst Contracts Signed This Offseason
NHL Free Agency Period: 5 Worst Contracts Signed So Far This Offseason
NHL free agency is commonly known as the place where teams go to overspend in bidding wars to obtain the services of top available players.
Some players hit the open market due to cap constraints or other financial reasons, but it’s important to remember that most of these guys reach NHL free agency for a reason. If they’re key core pieces, teams usually find a way to lock those players up to long-term deals.
GMs must be careful this time of year as they look for ways to fill needs for the upcoming season. For those particular teams with desperate needs (i.e. top-six winger or top four RH defenseman), it’s easy to covet/overvalue a player based on the limited available options.
Without having the actual figures in front of me (purely speculation), you might be able to call the NHL free agency period a birth place for the majority of eventual buyouts. Very rarely do these deals look bad in year one or two, it’s that same cap hit in middle to back half of the contract that becomes a problem.
Today, we’re exploring five contracts signed this offseason that may eventually become an issue for their respective clubs. As mentioned above, the problem isn’t the beginning of these new contracts, it’s the latter half that is concerning.
Worst Contracts During 2016 NHL Free Agency Period
June 27th – Andrew Shaw > Montreal (6 years x $3.9 million/year)
Due to cap issues, Chicago was forced to trade gritty power forward Andrew Shaw to Montreal at the NHL Draft. The Habs signed their new RFA acquisition to a six-year $24.3 million dollar contract.
These Blackhawks secondary scorers always find a way to get paid due to their success with the likes of Patrick Kane and Jonathan Toews, but how many of these Bryan Bickell, Kris Versteeg type situations do we have to go through?
He brings an element of physicality that is somewhat lacking for the Canadiens, but at nearly $4 million dollars, it’s simply too much money for the type of limited production he provides.
Related Story: 7 Minor Signings That Could Have Big Impact
July 1st – Darren Helm > Detroit (5 years x $3.85 million/year)
The 29-year-old has long been a reliable two-way bottom six forward having just finished his ninth season with the Red Wings. He had a career-high 33 points in 2014-15, and followed it up with a 26-point campaign in 2015-16.
With the scouting reputation of Detroit, why invest close to $4 million dollars/year on a third line player who could be easily replaced by a younger, cheaper option on an entry-level deal?
Related Story: Offseason Goals For All 30 Teams
July 1st – Milan Lucic > Edmonton (7 years x $6 million/year)
More from Puck Prose
- Detroit Red Wings 2023 Rookie Camp Has Plenty of Ups and Downs
- This Columbus Blue Jackets rookie doesn’t want to be forgotten
- 2 trades the Boston Bruins must make to secure the Stanley Cup
- 3 reasons the Avalanche won’t win the Stanley Cup in 2024
- This is a big year for Alex Turcotte and the Los Angeles Kings
This one comes with mixed emotions.
On the one hand, Milan Lucic steps in as a decent replacement for Taylor Hall. Whether he develops chemistry with Connor McDavid or not, who knows. Either way, GM Peter Chiarelli did a good job filling the void made days earlier.
Milan brings the perfect blend of skill and physicality that could help open up a bit of extra space for McDavid. All signs point to this deal working out quite well early on.
The question should be, “how will this contract look three to four years down the road?”. By that time, key players will be looking for new deals, the list includes:
2017: Nail Yakupov, Leon Draisaitl
2018: Laurent Brossoit, Anton Slepyshev, Darnell Nurse, Connor McDavid, Jordan Eberle (UFA), Benoit Pouliot (UFA)
2019: Jesse Puljujarvi, Ethan Bear
Related Story: 7 Inevitable Offseason Moves to Come
July 1st – Loui Eriksson > Vancouver (6 years x $6 million/year)
Leave it to GM Jim Benning to make one of the most questionable signings of the NHL free agency period. In the continued attempt to stay competitive while at the same time rebuild, Vancouver signed Swedish winger Loui Eriksson to a lucrative six-year deal based on past success with the Sedin twins at the international level.
More from Free Agency
- NHL free agents could still get contracts or camp invites
- Why any NHL team would be lucky to add Phil Kessel to their roster
- The New York Islanders made the right move extending Ilya Sorokin
- 2022-23 Recap Weaknesses and UFA Focused: Buffalo Sabres
- Arizona Coyotes Team Additions For 2022-23
The problem? Loui Eriksson saw his play digress once joining the Bruins as part of the Tyler Seguin deal.
His production was expected to slip in a more defensively responsible system, but no one expected to see his numbers virtually cut in half in year one after those three consecutive 70-plus point seasons in Dallas.
His numbers improved in 2014-15 with 22 goals (47 points), but there was more left to be desired from the once-36 goal scorer (2008-09). It wasn’t until he was in a contract year (this past season) that he managed to bring his game to a level of expectation.
When will GMs learn that you cannot hand out significant salary or term for a guy who shows up to play in a contract year?
Related Story: Toughest Protection Decision in Expansion
July 1st – Alexander Radulov > Montreal (1 year x $5.75 million/year)
Shortly after the Radulov signing, GM Marc Bergevin and company seemingly attempted to ensure fans that no character concerns exist. Most notably referencing new acquisition Shea Weber as one of the players they spoke to about Alex. Didn’t the entire Radulov debacle happen in Nashville under the leadership of Shea Weber?
Next: NHL Mock Expansion Draft: Post-Draft/Free Agency
The temptation to add that type of skill is overwhelming, but is it worth rolling the dice for such an expensive price? Surely that nearly $6 million dollars could have been more wisely spent to sign a pair of players.
Time to sit back and watch this one blow up in Marc Bergevin’s face.