The NHL’s Best non-Elite Defensemen in 2021
A list ranking the second-tier of defensemen playing in the NHL right now
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote an article ranking 2021’s ten best NHL Defensemen.
In that article, I used a method that hasn’t been done before. I first isolated Defensemen who fit my (self-defined) criteria for a #1 defenseman, then created a standardized score based on seven categories:
- Time on Ice (“TOI”) (which I got from natural stat trick);
- TOI vs. Elite Competition (which I got from PuckIQ);
- Points;
- Individual Corsi For % vs. Team Corsi For % (which I got from natural stat trick) – which I’ll call “Corsi Differential”;
- Plus/Minus;
- Blocks (which I got from hockey-reference);
- Hits (also from hockey-reference).
More from Puck Prose
- Detroit Red Wings 2023 Rookie Camp Has Plenty of Ups and Downs
- This Columbus Blue Jackets rookie doesn’t want to be forgotten
- 2 trades the Boston Bruins must make to secure the Stanley Cup
- 3 reasons the Avalanche won’t win the Stanley Cup in 2024
- This is a big year for Alex Turcotte and the Los Angeles Kings
What I got was a list that mostly met the eye test. Of course, there were some surprises. I didn’t expect Alex Pietrangelo to fall to ninth, nor Ivan Provorov to rise to tenth, or Kris Letang to fourth.
I’m interested in seeing whether this method is truly valid, so I expanded it to several other NHL defensemen, which I will go over in this article.
I also didn’t put some names on my list of #1 D that probably belong there, which I’ll go over first. Then, I’m going to look at some D that didn’t get enough Power Play time, followed by the D that didn’t get enough Penalty Kill time.
To recap, I defined a #1 D as a player who generally:
- Plays the most minutes on the team;
- Plays the toughest minutes (in other words, against elite competition);
- Quarterbacks the Power Play and also logs significant time on the Penalty Kill;
- Contributes offensively, while also being defensively responsible.
What I’m calling a “non-elite D” either didn’t fit the criteria to qualify as a #1 D or was a #1 D but wasn’t in the top ten.
Other Number One Defenseman – Morgan Rielly
Leafs fans would have surely noticed the omission of Morgan Rielly from my list. That was deliberate – I simply never assumed Morgan Rielly could be considered an elite #1 D.
But Rielly’s TOI was:
- 19:52 Even Strength
- 2:20 Power Play
- 1:59 Penalty Kill
- (Adjusted for a full season) He led his team in Even Strength minutes and TOI vs. Elite Comp.
Since he technically fit my criteria for a #1 D, I probably should have at least included him.
Although after plugging it in, I can see that it wouldn’t have changed the result:
- TOI: 97%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 83%
- Pts: 53%
- Corsi Diff: 41%
- (+/-): 54%
- Blocks: 49%
- Hits: 27%
Overall Score: 59%
Rielly spent enough TOI to be the #1 D in Toronto, but his numbers did not put him in the top ten. It is easy to look at Hits as a weakness, but keep in mind the category is only weighted as heavily as the other six. Roman Josi only scored 37 percent in hits, and Victor Hedman came in even lighter at 25 percent.
Where he actually suffered the most was Corsi Differential. The team was technically better overall when he wasn’t on the ice. And that’s certainly not what a #1 D should be.
Incidentally, Corsi Differential also hurt John Carlson, another player known for putting up the points. Like Carlson though, I would say that Morgan Rielly is more than just an offensive specialist (like a Tyson Barrie or a Torey Krug). But also like Carlson, that offensive production needs to be measured against Rielly’s defensive game.
Other Number One Defenseman – Duncan Keith
A former Norris Winner with three cup rings, Duncan Keith has had an amazing career. In prior years, I have no doubt he’d land high in the top ten. But it should come as no surprise that last year wasn’t one of those years. He did, however, check the boxes – I’d say he is still a #1 D in this league.
- TOI: 94%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 82%
- Pts: 41%
- Corsi Diff: 48%
- (+/-): 44%
- Blocks: 66%
- Hits: 35%
Overall Score: 56%
Keith is still logging heavy and tough minutes for the Hawks, but the results aren’t as shiny. The category that hurt him the most was points. At 41 percent, 18 of the 19 players I tested scored higher than him. Only Jacob Trouba had fewer points.
Other Number One Defenseman – Ryan Suter
When Ryan Suter and Shea Weber were both in Nashville, they were one of, if not the best tandem in the league. That seems like ages ago, but both Defensemen can still bring it. But while Weber has had a bit of a resurgence in his career, Suter’s game is slightly declining.
- TOI: 93%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 70%
- Pts: 64%
- Corsi Differential: 58%
- (+/-): 31%
- Blocks: 46%
- Hits: 23%
Overall Score: 55%
I initially thought Suter was a #1 D, but his TOI vs. elite comp is so low that I don’t think he’s there anymore. I don’t recall him ever being much of a Power Play Quarterback either, but he spent an average of 2:54 per night on Minnesota’s PP last year. That’s more minutes on the PP than Burns, Werenski, or Heiskanen.
On the one hand, Suter had a strong Corsi Differential. His team was better when he was on the ice. On the other hand, Suter’s (+/-) really hurt him. So he’s an above-average player on a below-average team. It’s not easy to be an above-average player on an above-average team, which is why Dougie Hamilton is in the top ten and Suter is not.
But when you consider Suter’s Corsi Differential in light of his deployment against elite comp, that above-average performance is suddenly revealing. He should be an above-average player if he’s playing against below-average competition.
Like Morgan Rielly, just 23 percent in Hits didn’t sink him, but without gaining much ground in other categories, it certainly didn’t help.
Bear in mind, though, that 55 percent isn’t exactly that far off from 65 percent. And if I am being realistic, this is the NHL we are talking about, where the margins should be narrow. What I am saying is that 55 percent doesn’t make Keith or Suter bad players – it actually suggests they are very good players. In 2021, they’re just not quite at the level a mere handful of their peers are.
Further criteria.
Some defensemen do everything for their team but quarterback the PP. In my opinion, in order to be considered a legit #1 D, those players must quarterback the Power Play.
I’m looking at some of those players next. But take their scores with a grain of salt. They are not being measured on the same criteria as legit #1 D.
In fact, after looking at the names, I suspect that the model I used biases defenders. That isn’t a bad thing – a defenseman’s most important job is to defend. But quarterbacking the Power Play is also a really important job. And it’s a job that comes with an extra 2:30 a night. So players with no PP duty can flourish in their other roles.
What I am saying is this. It might not be fair to compare the scores you see with the scores on my other list. But, it might be fair to compare these players against each other.
That or the methodology needs tuning.
Defensive Defencemen – Colton Parayko
Few human beings are as big as Colton Parayko but can move with such deceptive ease. The only other one in the NHL who immediately comes to mind is Tyler Myers.
With Pietrangelo’s departure, Parayko’s time to shine is 2021. But with Torey Krug’s addition, it’s likely he will continue to get a break from the PP. Parayko averaged just 0:46 per night.
- TOI: 100%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 98%
- Pts: 37%
- Corsi Diff: 27%
- (+/-): 58%
- Blocks: 57%
- Hits: 45%
Overall Score: 60%
First of all, Parayko got a tough assignment last year. He was among the league’s leaders in TOI (adjusted for missed games) and TOI vs. elite comp.
Although he is an excellent puck transporter, Parayko’s offensive production reflects the fact he only gets 0:46 a night on the Power Play. Eight goals actually isn’t that bad for an even-strength defenseman.
Parayko also plays a tough, physical game (pic related), which likely contributed to the injury.
What hurt Parayko’s score the most was his Corsi. The team was better when he wasn’t on the ice. That may have had something to do with Pietrangelo bringing the average up.
Now, it’s important to note that Pietrangelo wasn’t sheltering Parayko in St. Louis last year. It was the other way around, and I made that point when I ranked Pietrangelo at number nine on my list of top ten #1 D. Pietrangelo may have gotten a high Corsi, but he should have because he played so few minutes against elite comp. That was Parayko’s job.
In fact, it is hard to fathom St. Louis leaning any harder on Parayko in 2021 than they did in 2020. I’d be worried for the Blues if that was the case.
Defensive Defensemen – Jaccob Slavin
Jaccob Slavin shouldered heavy responsibility after their #1 D Dougie Hamilton (number four on my list) went down. In fact, Slavin finished with more even more Norris votes than Hamilton. Last year, Slavin was 5th in Norris voting while Hamilton was seventh.
- TOI: 95%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 99%
- Pts: 49%
- Corsi Diff: 56%
- (+/-):100%
- Blocks: 54%
- Hits: 21%
Overall Score: 68%
The Carolina Hurricanes were a strong team at even strength, and Slavin was one of the reasons. The team was marginally better when he was on the ice. And he got tough minutes against elite comp, and he got a lot of minutes.
Of course, limited PP duty probably helped. Slavin only averaged 0:54 per night.
One curious exception is Slavin’s hits, which suggest he’s not an overly physical player in his end. But his overall score was 68 percent, which is a very high score.
Now, I’m not going to suggest that Jaccob Slavin is as good as Victor Hedman (who also scored 68 percent, good for second in the top-ten). But a high score seems to agree with Slavin’s Norris treatment.
Defensive Defensemen – Darnell Nurse
There’s a controversial narrative in Edmonton that Darnell Nurse somehow didn’t rise to the occasion last year.
The controversy about Nurse relates to offense. I don’t define him as a #1 D because he doesn’t spend much time on the PP – he averaged just 1:03 per game. Nurse still posts a healthy amount of offense, but as I stated in an earlier article, I contended that his point shots weren’t leading to much offensive opportunity.
That being said, I don’t dispute that Nurse is a key player for the Oilers. He’s a big, intimidating, physical (and durable) puck transporter. He wins battles in his own end, moves up and down the ice well, and likes to activate on offense. That’s a rare and valuable skill set, even if his point shots are less effective. And he plays big-time minutes for the Oilers. On other teams, he’d be more insulated. So I want to put his value into perspective here.
- TOI: 101%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 94%
- Pts: 43%
- Corsi Diff: 58%
- (+/-): 38%
- Blocks: 68%
- Hits: 80%
Overall Score: 69%
You will note that Nurse scored 101 percent for Time on Ice. What that means is he was on the ice more than the highest player I tested when assembling the top-ten. By the way, that player was Drew Doughty.
Nurse was among the league leaders in TOI and in TOI vs. elite comp. So does it come as any surprise that his (+/-) suffered? With the injuries to Oscar Klefbom and Adam Larsson, Nurse and (rookie sensation) Ethan Bear literally carried the blue line on their shoulders last year.
In other words, Nurse got a slightly less difficult assignment than Parayko yet still managed to make his team tangibly better when he was on the ice. And he didn’t take any nights off.
And like Parayko, it was a gritty assignment. In fact, it was even grittier – Nurse was among the league leaders in hits and blocked shots.
He might not have gotten the Norris love that Jaccob Slavin did, but his overall score was higher. And this causes me to think that regardless of whether my methodology holds up, Nurse’s impact is highly underappreciated by many fans.
Defensive Defensemen – Alex Edler
In prior years, Edler probably was a legit #1 D in Vancouver, but his lack of Power Play time has hurt his contention this year (1:11 on the PP). Still, though, I was surprised to learn that he had such an excellent overall score.
- TOI: 89%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 85%
- Pts: 52%
- Corsi Diff: 52%
- (+/-): 67%
- Blocks: 95%
- Hits: 60%
Overall Score: 71%
Perhaps Edler shows what a legit #1 D can really do when they get a night off from the PP.
However, Edler seems to have gotten even more of a break. His TOI was low, and his competition wasn’t overly elite. On the other hand, his blocks were off the chart, and both his hits and plus/minus were very strong.
Given his age and injury problems in recent years, I believe Edler is frequently overlooked. In reality, he was highly effective last year, even if his minutes were somewhat favorable and his sample size small.
Defensive Defensemen – Charlie McAvoy
With Zdeno Chara and Torey Krug leaving in the offseason, Charlie McAvoy may need to become Boston’s #1 D. But based on his performance last year; the Bruins organization might think he’s ready.
- TOI: 97%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 105%
- Pts: 44%
- Corsi Diff: 59%
- (+/-): 88%
- Blocks: 67%
- Hits: 65%
Overall Score: 75%
McAvoy’s point production wasn’t exceptional. Perhaps if he gets more opportunity on the PP, that will change. He averaged just 1:20 last year. But other than that, he was very strong in every other category.
And 75 percent is about as good as it gets on this list. Roman Josi topped the top ten #1 D list with an overall score of 74 percent. Once again, that isn’t to say that McAvoy is better than Josi. But that does show how exceptional McAvoy’s year was. And at just 23, there is room for improvement.
I think McAvoy’s overall score also reflects the opinions of Norris voters. He finished tenth in that race.
On the flip side, there are the Defensemen who spend most of their time on the Power Play and almost no time on the Penalty Kill. And in fact, the four players I am going to look at next spent virtually no time on the PK at all.
As with the Defensive Defensemen, comparisons with the top ten #1 D should be avoided since the criteria is different. Spending no time at all on the PK makes a Defenseman’s overall job easier.
Offensive Defensemen – Quinn Hughes
Expectations in 2020 were probably higher for Quinn Hughes‘ younger brother Jack, the first overall pick in the 2019 draft. Quinn himself was drafted seventh in 2018, and for a 19-year-old defenseman, he clearly stole the show.
- TOI: 87%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 75%
- Pts: 72%
- Corsi Diff: 106%
- (+/-): 23%
- Blocks: 23%
- Hits: 3%
Overall Score: 56%
First of all, it’s fairly rare to see 20-year-olds playing a full season in the NHL on defense. Typically, young defenders are 22 before they get a full season. But it’s simply unheard of for 20-year-old defensemen to score 53 points (64 adjusted over a full season). What Hughes did was incredible. In just his first year, he has established himself as an elite offensive defenseman.
There are two scores which look like typos but aren’t. First of all, Vancouver’s Corsi was far better when Hughes was on the ice – an impressive feat. On the other hand, he managed just seven hits last year. Seven.
But Quinn Hughes is only 21. He is a far cry from the 6-foot-5 230 pounds Eric Lindros was when he was 21. But like most humans (Lindros was not), Hughes will surely improve the physical side of his game in the coming years. What remains to be seen is whether that maturity will enable him to transition from being a purely offensive talent into a legit #1 D and one of the league’s best.
Offensive Defensemen – Cale Makar
2020’s Calder winner, Cale Makar, had a breakout year that was no less incredible than Quinn Hughes’. And at just 22, he also has plenty of room to improve his already impressive game.
- TOI: 84%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 76%
- Pts: 81%
- Corsi Diff: 57%
- (+/-): 65%
- Blocks: 28%
- Hits: 26%
Overall Score: 59%
I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw 2021 Hughes post similar numbers to 2020 Makar. After all, Makar is one year older than him.
Like Hughes, Makar got relatively easy minutes, which ultimately hurts his overall score. That’s obviously offset by how much better his points were. And also, like Hughes, the physical game is missing, although not to the same extent.
Offensive Defensemen – Shea Theodore
Shea Theodore is a few years older than Hughes and Makar, but I think that it’s debatable whether his game is any farther along.
- TOI: 93%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 57%
- Pts: 60%
- Corsi Diff: 99%
- (+/-): 65%
- Blocks: 33%
- Hits: 9%
Overall Score: 60%
A few numbers jump out at me with Theodore. His Corsi Differential was extremely high on a team that already has an extremely high Corsi Differential. In fact, that number is 58.50 percent – that’s a truly phenomenal shot share.
On the other hand, Theodore got hardly any time against elite comp. Even Hughes and Makar are head and shoulders above him. Clearly, whenever possible, Theodore gets the easiest assignments in Vegas.
And like Hughes and Makar, his game isn’t very physical. And physicality is an important part of playing defense. How do you expect to defend when you can’t win a battle on the boards or in front of the net?
Offensive Defensemen – Thomas Chabot
Thomas Chabot was head and shoulders above anyone in the league for minutes played. His TOI and TOI vs. elite comp were also far beyond any of his teammates. Clearly, he has become the cornerstone of the Ottawa Senators’ blue-line in the wake of Erik Karlsson’s departure. And at the young age of 23 to boot. So I was a little surprised to learn that Chabot spent no time on the PK.
- TOI:110%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 94%
- Pts: 51%
- Corsi Diff: 78%
- (+/-): 8%
- Blocks: 41%
- Hits: 37%
Overall Score: 60%
Chabot was a TOI monster for the Senators last year. No Defenseman had a tougher assignment than he did at even strength. Chabot also spent 3:15 a night on the PP.
To give a 23-year-old defenseman all that ice time, it shouldn’t be overly surprising to see his Plus/Minus take a hit. What is surprising, though, is that despite a tough assignment, the Senators were a significantly better team when Chabot was on the ice.
On the other hand, for a player with so many minutes, Chabot didn’t block very many shots or make very many hits. He is only 23 though, so I expect to see improvement in 2021 from an already impressive young player.
Offensive Defensemen – Neal Pionk
The Winnipeg Jets’ Blue Line has a new name: Neal Pionk.
Even though his time on the PK was a little light at 0:53 per night, Neal Pionk had an impressive debut with the Jets. He took on a heavier than expected role with Dustin Byfuglien’s abrupt retirement and definitely rose to the challenge.
- TOI: 96%
- TOI vs. elite comp: 93%
- Pts: 58%
- Corsi Diff: 81%
- (+/-): 62%
- Blocks: 39%
- Hits: 78%
Overall Score: 72%
Here’s an offensive defenseman who really did it all last year. It’s crazy to think he was undrafted. That’s a story in and of itself. As we’ve seen time and time again on this list, when players are given higher TOI and TOI vs. elite comp, their (+/-) tends to falter. Not so for Pionk, and his Corsi Differential was much higher than his team’s average.
Pionk’s a couple of years older than Charlie McAvoy, but he’s thrust into a similar role, leading a blue line in the process of transition. I am surprised Pionk didn’t get more attention from Norris voters. Surely Jets fans knew he was one of the brightest surprises last season.
Takeaways
I looked at these players to help assess whether the methodology I used in making my top ten list was valid. I don’t think we could possibly say that Darnell Nurse and Jaccob Slavin are better than Victor Hedman, even though their scores were similar. So I think that at best, the methodology could only work if comparing similar players.
I also noticed that offensive defensemen scored lower. Taken alongside the fact the defensive defensemen scored higher, I wonder if the methodology was skewed in favor of defenders. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, though – a defenseman’s first priority always remains on defense. I do, however, feel like there’s a way to score all defensemen; I just need to find it.
I thought it was interesting the offensive and defensive defensemen were (for the most part) younger than the #1 D. I wonder whether some of the names we are looking at in this article are the #1 D of tomorrow. I guess we’ll see.
Thanks for reading!